If the lad is really good and it is suggested by the media,rafa shud sign such a player.For one thing it can be painful when one sees such player doing really well in a rival club in d epl,wen he shud hav been signed on the cheap.Such player shud be signed to avoid regrets and pains,then he can learn from experienced players.
"Besides, liverpool should go to south america (argentina) for strong,quick talented players.Those guys dont get injured easily,after all a handful of them are in the epl as a proof. I dont think Angel di maria should be to much for pool to sign with the influnce of mascherano.If they can afford to offer common 15mil for k .jones,then they should be able to go for him."
"why sign players when they r gonna be loaned out or sold later.lfc already has lots of players in reserves.they should sign players like mcgeady,kroos,misimovic,van der vaart,beckford,lahm,stephen taylor,shawcross,kuranyi,kiessling coz the fist team is not balanced & lack depth in reserves.lfc relied too much on gerrard n torres. "
"well despite all of this transfer talk, there are 2 priorities for the club, a second quality striker (david villa wud b amazin, if only..) and a left back, because insua is out of his depth at the moment as he has been thrown into the deep end of it."
Comments
Submit your views in the box below. Alternatively, you can debate these issues with fellow fans on our Message Boards or blog about them on The Kop
The views expressed here are not those of Liverpool Football Club (read more)
You must be over thirteen years of age to post a commment
You must have set a nickname to post a comment.
Click here to set your nickname.
Sorry, comments are closed for this article.
Sorry, new comments are closed for this article.
You must accept the Terms & Conditions before posting a comment
6th Apr 2010 15:48